visionOnTV's Olympics channel
Greenwich Park - Why take risks with Britain's heritage?
Article | Environment | Planning & Development
Holding the Equestrian Olympics in Greenwich Park is a bad idea, and it may never have got off the ground if the bid company: a) had not over-estimated the size of the Park; b) had carried out rudimentary environmental research; and c) had done a cost-benefit analysis against comparative sites.
Having won the bid, the organiser, LOCOG, is determined to go through with its plans despite the problems posed by holding such a major event in a fragile World Heritage Site. Its determination is rooted in the fact that equestrian is in decline; an iconic setting in an urban location might help to promote it, and the International Equestrian Federation has made it clear that, if Greenwich Park is not used, then the prospects for the sport in future Olympics are in peril. Hence the pressure to take risks.
Submitted by Charles Batsworth on Fri, 08/01/2010 - 00:03.
Stolen land
Submitted by Martin Slavin on Mon, 02/11/2009 - 20:35.
Graffiti Artworker Blue One Off
Submitted by Martin Slavin on Wed, 19/03/2008 - 23:37.
A beginners guide to the social impacts of the Olympics
Article | Barcelona 1992 | Chicago 2016 | Legacy | London 2012 | Mega Events | Olympics Studies | Planning & Development | Sydney 2000
The Olympics project is large and complex. It is not easy to quickly grasp the nature of its probable impacts on the Lower Lea Valley and London. Here is a collection of four useful papers which together give a relatively short description of some of the significant impacts.
Submitted by Martin Slavin on Sun, 21/01/2007 - 19:01.


Recent comments
1 week 6 days ago
2 weeks 1 day ago
2 weeks 3 days ago
3 weeks 3 days ago
4 weeks 1 day ago
4 weeks 3 days ago
7 weeks 22 hours ago
7 weeks 3 days ago
8 weeks 17 hours ago
8 weeks 1 day ago