Updated Background Papers are now available at http://www.gamesmonitor.org.uk/media_centre
Background Paper 1 - Impact (PDF) 170.23 KB
Submitted by Steve Dowding on Wed, 02/06/2010 - 13:27.
The 2012 blog continues to churn out the same misleading information. A recent posting by a local resident reminded me of the experience of going through the compulsory purchase inquiry and having our estate and community dismissed by the LDA. I tried to post a comment but, not for the first time, that was disallowed. Like a true colonialist operation the ODA claims to listen to ordinary people and to practise inclusion, but its own publicly funded website refuses to allow a proper debate.
Submitted by Julian Cheyne on Mon, 11/01/2010 - 02:58.
Olympic Games displace people through eviction. They also result in higher land values and the consequent displacement of poorer residents through rises in rents and higher house prices. A recent report by Dr Georgios Kavetsos of the Cass Business School has confirmed that this process is underway in the vicinity of the 2012 London Olympic Park.
Submitted by Julian Cheyne on Wed, 25/11/2009 - 21:21.
Submitted by Martin Slavin on Thu, 22/10/2009 - 18:15.
As reported by Crain’s Chicago Business reporter, Greg Hinz:
Submitted by Steve Dowding on Fri, 26/06/2009 - 09:56.
I came across this comment about the impact of the Olympics on the regeneration of the east end of London in a recent interview with Peter Hall. He is Professor of Planning and Regeneration at the Bartlett School of Architecture and Planning, University College London. From 1991 to 1994 he was Special Adviser on Strategic Planning to the Secretary of State for the Environment, with special reference to London and South-East regional planning, including Thames Gateway and the Channel Tunnel Rail Link. In 1998-9 he was a member of the Deputy Prime Minister's Urban Task Force.
Submitted by Martin Slavin on Mon, 15/06/2009 - 19:08.
Professor Bent Flyvbjerg took up his post as Chair of Major Programme Management at the Said Business School at Oxford University on April 1st 2009.
“In a landmark study, ....[he] analysed over 250 major transport infrastructure projects and found that 90% went over budget — and that the benefits averaged only half of those promised. This was so consistent that Flyvbjerg concluded it amounts to “strategic misrepresentation”, and that the culprits are politicians and bureaucrats competing for scarce public resources or seeking to get a suspect project off the ground to make political capital.“
Submitted by Martin Slavin on Sun, 26/04/2009 - 17:46.
Flagged up recently on our newsgroup was an article on the opendalston blog on the financial difficulties facing developers Barratts, contractors for the so-called Dalston Olympic Transport Interchange and numerous building projects around Stratford High St.
Submitted by Steve Dowding on Thu, 26/02/2009 - 01:15.